i wish i could google angelicism again in the next century
.
fr
i want to be able to read the internet from 2500
like vanish rn
and appear again in 2500
there would be so much to read
.
since musk bought twitter
.
since musk bought twitter it’s like the platform is far more speculative, in my mind it’s hard to distinguish between the TL and any empty box theorem
SBF assumes the price rises and the empty boxes mark to market and that the X which could be anything becomes a token
one could say there is a shimmer on the zero
it always looks as if the X becomes a token
angelicism is obv a white box theorem itself
but it doesn’t assume the mark to market
it doesn’t assume the X becomes a token X
angelicism has never minted for example
and that was intentional
etc and so on
it’s a kind of shimmerontology
i think in a way it makes sense the tw price would seem to go to zero like we’re remembering these are empty boxes too
.
.
basically everybody wants adjacency
so the whole of the TL trends towards a single-adjacency state
right now one form of that adjacency-singularity is being-one-remove-from-Musk
so the whole TL is revealed as an empty box theorem again
.
.
in the meantime angelicism, as the name given to this whole situation where every name wishes to be adjacent, rests as unconstructed union, which is pure adjacency
it rests as unconstructed union and purity because it stays in the steady state of being an empty box
the problem is when zero is misunderstood as void
and then you have to mark to market
because you have to get beyond emptiness which is actually just purity
.
or you cling to zero because the price of posting has gone to zero (posting itself will go to zero), so these are just other empty names
.
i love ∪
esoteric 0 worship