ON FILMICITY ZERO ONE

In a meeting about the making of an absolute film you’re already in the meeting/making the film/not making the film, it makes it much easier.

When she speaks of her new mathematics she speaks of the space of the meeting, sometimes 8 hrs long, like a version of La Maman et la Putain.

For example u make a one minute invisible film and nobody pays any attention and neither does the maker, years later in the 23rd century ppl using probability theory to solve the Drake Equation come back to this film.

Film has nothing to do with the history of cinema so far. Film 01 is filmicity, an invisible film. It’s what’s looking before film, on film—through the film.

When we meet to discuss the film online we already know what it is and compromises won’t be necessary. Those who work on it are enamoured or not. We also invite enemies cause the set of the film is clopen.

.

Anything made for the film is perfect cause it’s film.

.

Mistakist heaven.

.

Each person has a universal right to make the best film of the century is the only right way to make a movie.

.

No One’s movie.

No One’s land.

.

If all knowledge is already present (Dzogchen) it completely changes the orientation of making a film, it kind of relaxes everything: we are discovering what we have invented but really we have both invented and discovered already. We relax into it in the way that the results to the Drake Equation are there even tho we don’t know them. So we relax in the space of the great massive unfinished beautiful film 01 and this is very different and new.

.

Amazing arrival at unfinished condensed explosively multi-matrilinear seriality, the amazingly beautiful uninterrupted filmic-ness of film 01.