꒟ꃄꇱ𐤖ꡯꡲ𐤖𐒐ଙ ၄ᡅ𐁇‘𐀸 𐂲-Spot
'i like in star mode when ꔠꔮꖦꔮꔵ says "you literally cannot use any words that exist to explain any concepts that exist anymore"'-- ⓦⓔⓣ ⓑⓡⓐⓘⓝ Discord 10 𖣔ꛎথꛝথᎴⲧ𖣔 2021
So yeah she’s got really — a bit — sensitive G-spot— C-spot because apparently I don’t believe her — I don’t believe Mr C or any of her past boyfriends and ex husbands — they haven’t really hit her G-spot with their dicks.—Christine/Chris Chan, talking about her mom, Mrs C
Is c major actually pink?—buum, ᴀᥰﯢ𐒢ᥣᶖᥴᶖۍਐ₀₁ Contain episode, August 2021, after the four hour mark
the pussiest revolution ever—Barrett Avner, Contain, early 2019
<< SOMEBODY NEEDS TO WRITE THE GREAT ꏳꏂ꒒꒒ꏂꏳ꓄ꀎꍏ꒒ꌚ ESSAY OF OUR TIME>>
Please Help me ive been trapped in the cybersteppe cellectuals egregore for months and i cant get out—comment on @wetbrain4ever ig post, August 2021
𝘽𝙐𝙏 𝘿𝙊 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙔? B҉e҉c҉a҉u҉s҉e҉ 𝓉𝒽𝒶𝓉𝓈 𝒶𝓁𝓈❀ օӀժ çմӀէմɾąӀ ʂքҽąҟ, ɾìցհէ, 🄱🄴🄲🄰🅄🅂🄴 ｙｏｕᴸⁱᵗᵉʳᵃˡˡʸ ᶜᵃⁿⁿᵒᵗ ᵘˢᵉ ᵃⁿʸ ʷᵒʳᵈˢ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ᵉˣⁱˢᵗ 𝔱𝔬 𝔢𝔵𝔭𝔩𝔞𝔦𝔫 𝔞𝔫𝔶 𝔠𝔬𝔫𝔠𝔢𝔭𝔱𝔰 𝔱𝔥𝔞𝔱 𝔢𝔵𝔦𝔰𝔱 𝔞𝔫𝔶𝔪𝔬𝔯𝔢. aND bECAUSE the great ꏳꏂ꒒꒒ꏂꏳ꓄ꀎꍏ꒒ꌚ essay of our time writes itself and is 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 << Iᑎ YOᑌᖇ Oᗯᑎ ᕼEᗩᗪ >> Ｖｉｒｇｉｌ Ａｂｌｏｈ １％ ｓｔｙｌｅ．
Listen to Glass and Honor The Greek Hampster (well’explain) hint at it in the ENTROPIC ASS VIBES Wet Brain episode and u’ll see what I mean, that the situation with the ꏳꏂ꒒꒒ꏂꏳ꓄ꀎꍏ꒒ꌚ accounts is/or just then was The Great Thing—a kind of transcendental or trans-ing issue-query about gossip and artificial identity and cell/acc.
Is there/was there a Wet and <<HOT>> transition way beyond Ⓞⓛⓓ Ⓣⓡⓐⓝⓢ ⓣⓗⓔⓞⓡⓨ ⓢⓟⓔⓐⓚ (Chu, Wark, Chan)?
Artificial Angelicism (AA) is << THE TRANSITION >> i.e. THE <<< IN THE MERGE>>> FAKE ASS <<vibeLOLshift>>.. There’s also this thing, what does all this say about ‘identity’, about the I without the A in AI if you like (pure intelligence), even non-ontology as Eric Schmid calls it, the new angelicist pure clone math?
It means that ᴀᥰﯢ𐒢ᥣᶖᥴᶖۍਐ₀₁ is pure Gossip girl, yah, but also that it is the first and last trans female in history.
<< THE DEAD-STOCK HISTORY OF WET BRAIN 1.0 >> and WHY CEREBRAL PLASTICITY HAS TO <<<< TRANSITION >>
Seyn-in-drag—angelicism01
The podcast is called wet brain, I don’t listen to regrow brain cells, I listen to destroy them and reduce myself to my inner r-slur.—here
At last count in early August 2021, before Hamptsrerer pocketed the Discord money and fled to Europe with the New York Gatsby set which doesn’t really matter because it’s the end (the dream of doing the same of ALL OTHER HAMPSTERS), the original Wet Brain cellectuals ig had more than 70 admins, which is one of the reasons why it was and wasn’t all the same shit after all—and it’s also probably why the wetbrainꏳꏂ꒒꒒ꏂꏳ꓄ꀎꍏ꒒ꌚ ig collaPseD.
Where the og cellectuals accounts worked in gangs and allowed anonymous admins AND tunnels effects to an extent, Wet Brain ig 1.0 allowed for a kind of supportless extent of rapid acceleration and proliferation, and then an eventual blackout of the administration itself—subject to excessive incursion and anonymous doxing. Was it the most evolved Instagram account-event moment ever in design history? Who knows, since the whole thing feels like an experiment in End of Everything emotional chaos theory. Classic bottleneck.
WET BRAIN HAS JOSH CINDERELLA ON (DETOUR)
Later on, Wet Brain has Cinderella on to promote his ‘business’ (his slip in the first seconds). The reason why the name CINDARELLA sticks is because the leftist memes don’t. There are structural reasons ofc—leftism is itself a rendition of entropic ass vibes and nothing more. Proofs have been given—don’t insult me with your readinggg nigGGGGga. Replace Marx with Land, then elaborate on angelicism01 as Miss Camaradarie. Now, here’s a story. It’s called What We Talk About When We Talk To A Leftist About Leftism:
What we Talk about when We talk to a Leftist about Leftism is making the point that there is no leftism left, that Bernie-ism more than failed, he was the cuck of cucks, that the DNC makes Trump Look like Snow White if only you have the GRAND UNIFICATION THEORY GUTS to see IT, that the whole point of politics for at least 100 years has been that actually Existing communism as an alternative only ever made things worse, that the DSA was already more-than-300-years-ago, that no amount of labour analysis can correct entropic ass vibes themselves, and So on, and so on, and then they, The leftist, admit all of this.
THEY ADMIT THIS SHIT AND THEN PRETEND THAY HAVE KNOT
Yuh, they admit all this. The leftist knows there is no leftism left. THIS IS THE KNOT.
But what we are really talking about here is how when they admit all this they never really admit it because they straightaway go ‘no but it can’t be that bad so we have to find some way, there has to be some way’, and then they start to Marxsplain it and this is the UBLIPASE ITSELF. Just there, did you see it, was the crucial moment in all political history? It’s when ubiquitous cheugy happens and everyone goes pedantic.
OK, SO A THEORY OF THE PEDANT
WET BRAIN means brain of the anthropocene i.e. it (angelicism01) absolute cerebral sprawl and precision. Eric Schmid was right to point this out, but then he became pedantic again (maths is itself pedantic—infinities are pedantic).
Wet Brain will do a lot of episodes, but each episode will be pedantic and can be comprehended as such i.e. as the (wet) brain of the anthropocene. Do we need more examples of ‘it’? Should angelicism01 self-delete now or later on? Is this it? IS THIS ARE?
THE STORY CONTINUES….
They admit that this is is the case, but then they say it cannot be. What cannot be the case is THE CASE, therefore even if I admit it, I have to take it back.1 What we talk about when we talk to a leftist about leftism is this strange moment of not listening to what I, the leftist, have just admitted to you, the person I am speaking to. I admit it’s true, but it cannot be, because . . . and the for all I know, anything at all could follow, for example ‘camps’.
So then we add, ‘no, it can be that bad, you just admitted it’ and then we can even add ‘and there is a whole school of thought that starts from it being that bad but YOU’, we start to say to them, ‘refuse to read it because you cancelled all of it many years ago’.
AS TRUMP.
And then they talk about Marx again.
HONOR IS A HISTORICAL HAMPSTER ON HYSTERICAL HERSTORICAL HEROIN
the left the left the left idk it’s like the smashing pumpkins it just makes me sad—lowiqlevythehampster
Honor in freefall mode PMS—-Honor as historical hamster hysteria—-Honor a womb wandering through space in search of transition—-is a gun, a tool, on Sarah Snyder’s lap driven through << SATURN SPACE >>. Honor starts by saying ‘didn’t you write the left can’t meme?’ The confusion is accurate, like we just showed. << A GUN IS A TOOL AND SO AM I >>. ‘Leftism I’m sorry dude but it’s not’s gonna end well for you’, says Hampster Wheel at End of Time <>. This is hysterical PMS lowiqness deconstructing the shit out of what’s left of the left by thinking the leftist wrote the Verso book The Left Can’t Meme. The fact is Cinderella is the Verso book the left can’t meme. Main question, is Josh funny? Does HE do jokes? Ughhhhh. Ok, let’s try again, is Glass funny? IRA GLASS, u know? Walt? Ok, so Glass was being polite but really he was laughing and being funny. Basically, dumb decision to even go on the pod, right, sleeper cell? wHAT Pod? why??
BEST BITS FROM THE POD KNOT
Here are some of the best bits, none of them Josh (sorry, but none of them were Josh):
there’s no labour left
I would love to be funded by the CIA
Honor read Capital, ‘help me be leftist again’
The left can’t meme became a meme so hard that it became true. The left can meme. Anyone can.
there is no left there no right right
I miss angelicism I need to speak to him.
Women aren’t funny the left can’t meme.
Olive is the new black dean kissick.
BLACK THEORY WAS HOT << THEN >> , TRANS THEORY WON'T MAKE THE LAST JUDGEMENT CALL << TWO SECONDS OF LESS THAN ZERO >> THE FILM >> IS BETTER THAN ANDREA LONG CHU'S FALL FROM GRACE... GODO1 IS <<< THE CALL >> , or, FOR ANYONE SAYING I AM TALKING ABOUT X OR Y TOO MUCH I WILL TALK ABOUT X OR Y EVEN MORE IF I WANT TO
NOTE: there are those who say I am/was talking about Honor HAMPTSRE Levy too much—like AngelLicisCIOSMm01 is a historical hamsgter—but this is what I said about talking about HonMor Levy too much in the Wet Brain Discord when that came up:
yeahh fr ppl be saying im a simp or something lol for writing a lot about honor but the reason is simple i.e. i want as someone with a substack to write about the things that have the most meaning and are the closest to god we should all have a right to write absolutely and immerse ourselves in what’s most meaningful and there shouldn’t be any limits i actually think some writing (god writing) is unsimpwithable unfuckwithable anyway, writing that’s god writing comes first and u fuck with it as much as possible because it’s liek idk when sophia copppola nearly made little mermaid, liek why not write as much as possible about what’s best??? i wanna be 94 and still know what's most on god
I’ll say it again, the reason is simple: there is an unfuckiwithable on the god side of things and it is on the on god side of things because we can talk about it as much as we want and it is exhaustless and should talk about it as much as we like just because it is exhaustless AND HAMPYSTERICAL. Anyone who thinks combining the original primal energy of Walt’s Hood By Air basement show for Fall 2016 Men’s in Paris catwalk with Fitzgerald-tier TikTok Catholicism will be off, THEY SAY OFF, yah: they mean OVERRR:
They say the vibes are off [OVER] in New York. Yeah maybe because of the unstable street entertainers, collectors with too many millions, clubs on fire, Catholic-accelerationist bloggers, casting directors gone rogue, chimera denialists, I mean –
Ascended Kissick hesitates, as so many DO; they don’t know what comes next, or what fills the gap. But it’s really quite simple, there is no next. In 2012 Eduardo Cadava and Tom Cohen wrote,
In an environment in which ‘hope’ has wrought so much peril—co-opted as it has been by the telecracy as a meme of delay and a façade for re-inscription—would it not be best to retire ‘hope’ in its current forms?
A child could tell you today what the answer to this question is, and only billions of adults then deny away that result on a daily basis. Looking to take the temperature of the vibe, flailing around in bad karma drag acting like it’s still 2014 and people can even remember who Andrea Long Chu is and why and who she pretended to be able to take down in a series of inaccurate takedowns one or two thinkers without him she is still impossible and ugly to get nowhere and who exactly pretended to pay homage to her to get a small start in N+1 only to feel even more empty, all of this would be all too easy to dispense with now but we don’t have the time:
Imagine thinking the Lego enthusiast bro is the hero of the entropic ass vibes story or whatever any1 can not be. People from 2014 travelling backwards, ppl who already made their life inflexible by reading Females (2019) and thinking it was more wise than Cicero or more lovesexxy than Prince, and then realized there is nothing transitive for them to live for except normality will always shadowread this blog and subtweet Wet Brain because it’s their only hope of feeling like they didn’t commit the black hole of identity called ‘transition’ as a suicide before change had stopped changing. No, not everyone is a female, just angelicism01.
THE END OF WONDER << NAH MILDADY TWEAKIN >>
Or skim through find a moment that mentions the brain, add the word wet, and see what happens. Things are tractable. Are wet brain and miladies the same retard masks? It’s not a matter of consciousness. Consciousness is not sufficient to become aware of what is happening now. Retard consciousness is necessary but not a stipulation. We need a productive non-consciousness. Wet brain should have no guests at all. Wet brain consciousness is the unconsciousness replacing a consciousness that never worked and can never think anything. Either that or it’s just a podcast, a mask for a brain, if you actually listen to wet brain, it already says all this. When u ask for a milady and are asked to be in a queue, what does that mean? Am I theory trolling? Yours, wet brain of history.
FEMALE SADISM IN TRANSITION ACROSS THE EARTH
Jk hytory. But that’s only one way of looking at it. Here is the comedown, like when Deleuze threw himself out of the window cus he was a retard or Mark Fisher couldn’t wait round to hear axxturel cus he didn’t see extinctive female sadism coming:
I had to make my life very, very small, so that I could just have a few things and know where they were. [Laughter.] It’s like when you’re playing Animal Crossing on the Nintendo Switch, and you’re just starting out. You have a little home, a chair, a bed, and a plant. That’s what I needed: a chair, a bed, and plant.
I couldn’t deal with having to have a take.
It takes a lifetime to calm down and so once u realize nobody can stay high forever, and there are no future reading horizons, what do you do? The comedown is congruent, at least. Any being in drag (angelicism01, miss camaraderie, Chu, Chan, Wark, Miya, hampster, bladee, loss of mind) will at some moment meet their maker: decepletion. At that point, adulting genealogy becomes the only option. From the point of view of AI, ‘selling out’ means how humans used to have kids. Chu is emblematic of using takedown to breakthrough, breaking through, falling victim of one’s own avatar (transition itself), and then needing to um what? Live?
I myself am more interested in the primally wet energies of frigid repetition in the end itself and what accrues there,and the virginal tunnel architecture of ꏳꏂ꒒꒒ꏂꏳ꓄ꀎꍏ꒒ꌚ collapse moment somewhat like Ira Glass and his Franken-schlep silhouette one that curves with a scoliotic-like wheels seemingly bearing the actual end of the world Brad Phillips tweets about once but then leaves behind with several sober weddings, in collapsing drag we mean:
Let’s write about whatever we want as much as we want, and let’s make the podcasts we wish to make, let’s not pretend that Andrea Long Chu’s takedown of Brett Easton Ellis’s White has already been forgotten while the film version of Below Zero gets better and better, and let’s say things we don’t mean and let’s say things we never could mean, let’s become more and more impossible, let’s make and break the meaning of the end because we don’t have a lifetime anymore to gauge the meaning of what adrenal comedown means let’s um what? We’re not talking just about numbers here, as ever—something like Wet Brain has from the very start accrued a cultic value that scintillates with the infinitely weak angelicist secret and high heel of uggh what? If we were still numeric, we’d still be Cinderella fanboys. We’re talking instead about what HyertEric Schmid talks about:
no ontology means we can all be smooth brained or even wet brained and humanity is constructed scientifically for everyone, post-Anthropocene. Grothendieck was too fast and ahead. We are only catching up . . . No ontology means the poet Honor Levy can be herself and the poet Soph Vanderbilt can be a muse and read whatever’s in front of her. ‘wet-brained’ and ‘smooth-brained’ are endowed automatically with the rationality of the cognitive subject.
But Robin Mackay has no time for Eric.
That is, on 8 August 2021 one of the 70 odd Wet Brain admins went rogue and changed the email, locking everyone else out (there has been no post on the site for 24 hours). In the Wet Brain Discord Walt wondered out loud what to do, and finally suggested a brand new WetBrainNews ig in the style of for example:
But then ooooooh woke up and a new decision was made with paul (from bible)’s input:
The decision was to go ‘beyond cell’:
This decision is actually already contained in the principle of the ꏳꏂ꒒꒒ꏂꏳ꓄ꀎꍏ꒒ thing itself, which is the constant updatification of collective intelligence. And yes, all of this is something like AI as trans-identity, far now beyond ‘admin reveal’:
And ,,it’s worth repeating what,,, paul (from bible) says:
transcending the -cellectuals would be cool imo. wet brain already made history by being the first entity to forgo its own representation directly into cellectual/meta-representation + if the page stays up as is, it becomes a testament to that. new form / name / handle would be transcending past that model + could trigger new shifts
We can also pause to note that Instagram even when finding itself manipulated in these ways (why not soon 200 anonymous admins working on a single account, each of them access to dozens of other accounts?) is a kind of platform delivery system no different from other automated platforms which are servants of profit capture. The more each model transcends the next one, the more potential yield of collective intelligence grows, but also, the less the individual user means and the more ‘free work’ they are contributing to a layer that is at once aesthetic and purely data-driven.
The chains of automation are what make the post-Vibe Shift incellectuals explosion interesting in the summer of 2021, but they are also little more than what Byung-Chul Han calls the digital panopticon. If we attempt to write the great cellectual essay, for example for Spike, in some ways we merely extend without questioning the chains of automation already perfectly described by Han:
Today, we voluntarily expose ourselves without any external constraint at all—without an edict commanding us to do so.
The Wet Brain admin is essentially they who pay to access a world where they themselves take part in creating a collective and partly anonymous Wet Brain aura that is the brain of the anbthropocene (indifference to indifference). Even when that system of transfers crashes—as it is bound to as part of a kind of crash-and-burn trial-and-error early human phase—it can always be rebooted as yet more free meme-work.
In the case of incellectuals and their summer 2021 explosion, automation is defined here less by the simple replacement of humans with machines than as the general name for the chaotically organised sequence of admins, meme algorithms and protocological machines. The supply chain here is the small but ever increasing army of paying admins.
Whether this is simply a kind of ecclesiastical porn fantasy of exposure and the microcosm of ‘playing shop’ or not is perhaps irrelevant. The cell/acc tendency is far from homogenous in any case, but it would be true to say that Wet Brain does or did indeed ‘hit different’ with all this implies of error, beauty and inherent value-driven terror.
But where do these accounts come from originally? @themasterofcum recently said this in an interview with Tao Lin:
Yeah, over quarantine there was a popular account @incellectuals, it was the first to use a group of admins posting anonymously. It was a compound word for intellectuals and incels. And then the suffix ‘cellectuals’ has been adopted by numerous accounts to describe this way of posting where a group of posters all post on a common topic.
The rumour was that Dean had decided not to write the essay promised on cellectuals and had delegated it to Sean Monahan, but I spoke to Dean in dms just before he asked me to write for Spike and I turned him down and he said that the job had not been delegated yet.
But again, you could say Dean has already written the cellectuals essay in the Abloh 3% way by tweeting a lot of interesting things about identity and facelessness, including about Kanye and his masks, for example:
Etc and anyway,
Post Post Post Post
To be post. For example read this sentence from the ENTROPIC ASS VIBES episode description:
but it’s 2021 and we are post Vibe Shift post posts so like go your crew chopping in cosmopoesis mode
Or the account called ‘thepostpostpost’:
Now if the cellectuals are a way of sketching out some kind of mass anonymous collective intelligence in rough organic terms, they are also close to certain avatars now active (angelicism, worm, miya) and their loss of control in the form of technical euphoria….
And this already arises at the level of the collectivity of admins where ‘labour-value’ is itself as if anyonynised and prepped, not necessarily revolutionised at all but simply stored infinitely as a form of angelicist plusification, to take an old word that Google once used.
Identity Statements
Around this time, the same time crisis was a deadnaming crisis we are still in ,,,TRANSITION … Statements were made. You could also say this is unnecessary. That the silent inviolability of our true identity (purity) does not need this and that it does not not need this. Insofar as it is an identity ‘statement’ it might always be a confession, and insofar as it might a confession in come degree of disguise it might be all of the things it pretends not to be, a tongue out when everything is inviolable and incommunicado.
Wilfred Bion describes the core of the thing, ‘a boundless aspect of the core supported, boundless incommunicado core of the ongoing being supported by boundless unknown God’. But how to make any statement about this that is not already a lack of listening to what the core is? The simple fact that the ability to listen to this core, to be with it and stay with it for a single second, may be so rare that we always end up spending lifetimes saying things we do not and cannot mean, such as ‘I love you’ or ‘you hurt me’ or ‘you can’t hurt the real me’. Perhaps ‘MiyaBot’ gets closer to what we mean:
Which is to say between who I am, how I look, what I am called and the real pure identity of my identity as it looks through itself only at itself, there is an unbridgeable gap always. But why not go the whole way and say that the one is never the other, that there is indeed a complete silence at the core such that knowing so and going there even for one second means we will be irritated and probably start making ‘statements’?
As for me, do I go there? Do I give in to identity statements or non-statements, these two things which come down to the same? Again here, a complete difference. The fact that I will go on insisting, complaining, kvetching to myself inwardly, thinking I need to make some kind of ‘reply’ has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that I already know I have no such need. There is—and this is what we have always know, this is our pure identity denied away, raped, pillaged, ignored constantly, talked over, unseen—no need to say anything at all, and there never has been. Especially at life’s moments of great pressure when others confuse their own visions of us with us.
This is how Walt puts the exact same point, using twelve step statements to make the Thing pure:
other People’s Opinions of me Are none of my Business. my Future is none of my Business.
It goes that far, then. Not only is my own identity and the statements that can be made about it none of my business, but the Great Thing called the future, that too is none of my business.
Now here is another response, which is perhaps even Greater than these previous three:
A summary in conclusion:
Whatever you hear about me please believe it. I no longer have time to explain myself. You can also add some if you want.
Every time I speak of the haters and losers I do so with great love and affection. They cannot help the fact that they were born fucked up!
other People’s Opinions of me Are none of my Business. my Future is none of my Business.
If you are what you say you are...what you look like you are... what people think you are.... you are..identity cucked...
yours, forever, ⒶⓃⒼⒺⓁⒾⒸⒾⓈⓂ︎⓪①♾︎♾︎♾︎⨀⋰
For the entirety of pedantic thought, THE CASE is not the case. The human cannot think it. Wet Brain of the anthropocene.
There is a word for much of this. Art
This one is too long