POCKET ANGELICISMS, or THE LANGUAGES OF ANGELICISM01
Write as if you're going extinct.
ZERO IQ/LOW IQ
In an infinitely expanding universe any 100% commitment will itself be infinitely expanding, and so to be now officially 100% low IQ is to make your name equidistant with the rainbow body and mind of loving open intelligence.
ZERO IQ/LOW IQ
We developed a theory of ultimate post cancellation culture that blossomed with the fictional cancellation of Honor Levy who when named ‘low iq’ on the TL was one of the first to understand this as a universal vocation and to integrate it into her own TikTok name, to honor the universal Douyin (抖音) name to come.
ZERO IQ/LOW IQ
That is, to be paraconsistent with the theory of the omnilapse the zero iq appellation can and will be applied to everyone and anyone and the true meaning of this hyper-cancellation is relative freedom and not relative torture. Everyone is up to go down in this way because it is already a state of affairs.
WE ARE THE FIRST TO GO FULLY EXTINCT IN DMS
Some of my online friends are extinct how about yours. Their images are online non-stop and there is everything to show for it. Their dms make me think we are really like that which is almost exciting so why not. (What is a dm.)
GOING GOING GOING
There are now different types of going: going zero iq, going extinct, going rainbow body (honghua), going post-cancelled, and unrelenting, passionate and vigorous post-human going, as well as wenting and go’dness.1
TIME TO KILL MARK FISHER
Mark Fisher was first called low iq in dms with DJ Kirsten Angel Dust in ~ 2019 and then in early 2020 on the TL and the rest has been machine history. To affirm that Mark Fisher needs to be killed is to affirm that his theory was an inadequate supplement and does not meet the present and therefore his hauntings need to be killed off again and again. Fr we need to kill Mark Fisher.
TO DEFEND FROM HARM
In order to defend ourselves from the confusion of World with Universe, it is necessary to disagree violently even with those to whom one is sympathetic. To defend from harm with the universal in mind, this means to disagree ferociously and to declare war against the entire world and against culture as such. Lol. Angelicism is interested in affirming aculture.
THE OFFLINE (SPIRITUAL VIOLENCE)
Being asked, compelled or invited to stay online in the midst of a life can always be the worst spiritual violence in the world. But spiritual violence (Weil) also names the avoidance in all contemporary plasticity of niche finitude and co-extinction. We can say without wavering that all culture is taken up in omnilapse (theory of retard) because we can say without wavering that it is impossible to include extinction qua extinction in the artistic object.2 In this sense alone, everything really is embarrassing.
SKYSAYING
Under the various names of skysaying we are tempted to develop a universal theorem of negligibility (superfluity). Again, the negligibility of all posting has nothing to do with the quality or quantity of a post and everything to do with the seeing-through of ubi-see-throughability all in good time.
SKYYSAYING
Going offline is questionable not because it is impossible but because there will always be a desire to show others who are now online what the offline which is in fact indistinguishable from the online now means. Both are beautiful within each. The offline is not and not not, the online is not and not not.
SKYYYSAYING
It’s like wanting to preserve the secrecy of something at the same time as disclosing it, like how do we allow to arrive a thought that has not yet arrived without making it arrive?
NONFINALIST AREALISM
We are realistic about how this does not map onto any currently visible world, except perhaps the world of absolute art and absolute beauty and without doubt the world of the great mind of bliss seeing emptiness.
NO PROJECTION
Angelicism does not mistake itself for a project nor even for a quantic ontology of seraphi clones, post matter or otherwise. Angelicism is itself the internet formulated as critique—that is, the internet at war with itself. In this strict sense, Angelicism is the announcement of WWW IV.
TRILLIONAIRE’S ANGELICISM
Any possible subject thinkable will with increasing probability have been thought of and developed already by somebody or some machine else, thus destroying the need not just for the academic unit but for the development of any idea from zero to fruition (ideation will be out of time). In other words, sheer demographics are the first and last indicator of universal intelligence. Analogies = Kanye’s ‘zero-touch’ or the ‘Fashion-AI’ of Virgil Abloh or Masa Son’s ‘$Infinity billion’. For nothing will we be needed except the three per cent.
GET INTO THE UNIVERSE
Since it does not mistake itself for a projection, neither should anyone feel forced to take away an injunction from the angelicist movement, which has become a transection of history at the point of iterated niche finitude. Anyone may be an angelicst clone which is to say there is an already in which they are, quietly. If there are injunctions perhaps these are ‘be infinite’ and ‘get into the universe’.3
THEORY OF DMS = ANGELICISM
everything we are saying now is a post
2:32 PM
these dms are the real posts
the experience of deep scrolling to find the real posts in these dms is the real post
2:39 PM
lol
each day we provide content here
who for
2:42 PM
when is a post content and when is a post not content
real question
when is content just content and when is it not content
is substack content or is it writing?
2:44 PM
substack is sub-stack
it’s pre-archive
or archive readied for maybe nothing maybe everything (iteration)
everyone ignores the name
2:45 PM
is substack the most offline platform
2:46 PM
2:47 PM
what is the difference between offlineism and deletionism
2:47 PM
substack is the return of Hypomnemata
it’s the oil rods of writing itself
covered in stolen sunshine
the secret writing pad of the soft angel ghost trying to save history from an absolute end = angelicism as itera
as an aside, the thing with substack angelicism is write quickly
anyone can write and edit to their better selves
but only real life angels can write and reach that better self first time = angelicism
2:48 PM
write and publish NOW today
the starry crown of the dream of the internet as original hypomnemata
write as if your going extinct
For going rainbow, see here for example: ‘Honghua (become a rainbow) is an occult phenomenon formed when the enlightenment great monk passes away. It is said when the enlightenment monk who has obtained a certain degree of Buddhism passed away, his body will convert into a rainbow and enter the Amita World of Buddhism.’ Recall that the rainbow body is illegal (cancelled in advance) by the Chinese. To own ultimate cancellation itself at zero quantity and quality is therefore to own the Chinese appropriation. We call this universal cultural appropriation. On go’d.
It is not included even when it is. That’s the point. One may only speak with any real consequence of the impossibility of inclusion being forgotten as the law of the angelicist supplement.
Weil: ‘Our rôle is to be ever turned towards the universal.’
can you summarize these for me